SocialRocketRequest a project

Magazine

US election ads push viewers away from streaming: what CTV ad pressure teaches us

Just under ten percent of surveyed US adults avoided political streaming ads. Savanta, Nielsen and AdImpact show why frequency control is becoming more important.

TV screen and remote control in a living room as a symbol for YouTube on connected TV
Foto: Jonas Leupe / Unsplash
Contents · 4 sections
  1. 012,61 billion dollars for CTV: where the ad pressure came from
  2. 02Some pay for peace, others simply switch programmes
  3. 03The campaigns' response: more creatives instead of an endless loop
  4. 04What German media teams can take away

The US election campaign 2026 has not only directed record budgets into streaming ads. It also shows what happens when ad pressure on the home screen becomes too great: just under ten percent of the US adults surveyed by Savanta responded to political ads by switching to ad-free offerings, cancelling a subscription or avoiding the affected channels. Adweek reported on the survey of around 1.800 people on 13 November.

The figure matters to media teams because it describes not just annoyed reactions but concrete avoidance behaviour. Especially on connected TV, where ads often cannot simply be scrolled past, how often viewers are exposed has a direct effect on the viewing experience.

2,61 billion dollars for CTV: where the ad pressure came from

According to AdImpact's final overview from 3 November 2026, political ad spending in the US midterms added up to 11,87 billion dollars. Of that, 2,61 billion dollars, or 22 percent, went to connected TV. Traditional broadcast television still topped the spending list with 5,84 billion dollars.

The total alone only partly explains the fatigue. What matters is the concentration in time and region. Nielsen recorded spending on political TV spots in the final week before the election that was 2,9 times higher than the average of the six weeks before. In individual local TV markets, election ads took up a substantial share of the available ad slots.

For brands outside politics, this is a very real media planning problem: an ad competes not only for reach, but may land on an audience that has already seen an overdose of similar spots within the same programme.

Some pay for peace, others simply switch programmes

The Savanta results show different reactions to this pressure. Those who did not want to see the campaign ads sometimes sought out ad-free subscription tiers, ended services or switched to other offerings. According to the report, 35- to 44-year-olds were particularly likely to mute ads, watch on a delay or cancel subscriptions.

The survey relates to the USA and the election context; its percentages are not a forecast for German streaming customers.

That ad avoidance is a broader topic had already been reported by Gartner in April 2026: 81 percent of the US consumers surveyed tried to mentally tune out ads. The study also describes active steps such as ad blockers or ad-free subscriptions. The election campaign now provides a particularly concentrated example of how such resistance plays out in everyday streaming.

The campaigns' response: more creatives instead of an endless loop

Interestingly, many political advertisers evidently had the limit of tolerance in view themselves. According to Nielsen, the 50 largest CTV advertisers increased their average inventory of creative variants from three in mid-September to eleven at the end of October. The message could thus change more often, instead of the same spot being aired over and over.

For commercial campaigns, this translates into a clear work plan: look at reach and frequency across platforms, capture audience overlaps between linear TV and CTV, and rotate creatives in good time. A high number of delivered impressions is no substitute for attention.

What German media teams can take away

Our earlier overview of the 11,87 billion dollars in election advertising and the CTV boom showed how strongly political budgets have shifted toward streaming channels. The new survey figures add the viewers' perspective: More inventory and better audience targeting do not automatically solve the problem of advertising overload.

This also applies to CTV measurement and cross-platform reach planning as well as political advertising on Snapchat, where engagement and public perception likewise need to be examined in a differentiated way.

If you plan CTV campaigns, you should therefore ask about three things: How often does a person see an ad? What do they experience between those exposures? And how do memory and aversion toward the brand change? The US midterms show why these questions are at least as important as the price per thousand impressions.

Source

Original report