Facebook at the panels: stock across all items

Facebook is the network with the most different order targets. Across all indexed panels there are 11,123 orderable entries in 16 service classes from 24 catalogues, and the difference between them lies less often in the price than in the question of what you are actually ordering for: a profile, a page, a group, a single post or an event.

This variety is the reason for the most common wrong order here. Followers and group members look almost the same in the catalogue, but they go to different addresses, and an order with the wrong address cannot be taken back. The same applies to views: a Reel, a Story and a feed video keep separate counters, and the panels list them as separate rows with their own prices.

It is also striking how unevenly the classes are populated. For likes and comments the offers sit close together; for event commitments and story views the price level depends on a few houses, and a single delisted row shifts more there than elsewhere across a whole catalogue.

One figure also belongs to the picture, because it comes from the fields and not from the titles: the number of offers in this network for which the panel reports a refill through its own interface is 885. This refers to the variant you can trigger yourself; what an offer name promises is a commitment and not a field. For pages and groups that is, after price, the practically most important property, because there what was delivered in minutes drops off over months.

The lowest priceable base price in this network is 0.005 € per thousand units, and the middle of the field is 2.40 €. The lower value is currently given by CrazyPanel — that is a property of a single catalogue and not a market situation, and at the next pull it may sit at a different house. Both are purchase prices at wholesale level, not what a German-language sales page charges for them.

For a profile or page there are Followers, for a group Group members — two goods that have similar names in the catalogue and are delivered to different targets.

On the individual post there are Likes, Comments and Post Shares. The last name is deliberate: "buy Facebook shares" leads in German to the stock market, and the catalogues themselves write "Post Shares" on almost every row.

For views, placement decides — Views for videos in the feed, Reel Views for Reels, Story views for Stories. In addition there are two goods with a timing: Live viewers must be present during the broadcast, and Event commitments are worth something before the event and nothing afterwards.

Which houses stand behind these rows is shown in the panel comparison.

Between two pulls the catalogue does not stand still. Since 31/10/2026, 188 entries in this scope have a different base price than before, of which 1 upward and 187 downward; 0 rows have been newly added and 0 have disappeared from the catalogues. The stated point in time is the oldest of these preliminary pulls, so that the row does not claim a freshness that its slowest component does not have.

Comparison is only made across the panels that have a second pull at all; their number is 24 and is not the number of indexed panels, because a newly added house has no history yet. As long as this second pull is missing, nothing appears here — a zero would mean "nothing has moved", and that is a measurement and not a gap.

Two details appear in no panel interface and are therefore maintained by hand from the panels' information: whether a house issues a proper invoice and which payment methods it accepts. The number of houses with an invoice in this scope is 2. Since 30/08/2026, none of these details has remained unchecked here — the oldest check is shown, not the most recent, because a date based on the last check would hide the houses nobody has looked at for longer. The number of houses without any check at all is currently 0.

Many of these rows resemble each other down to the quantity limits, and there is a reason: panels buy from the same upstream suppliers. Where entries from different houses within a class exceed our similarity threshold, we present them as a group and mark the more expensive rows with a note that they probably sell the same source — not all of them, because where the price gap can only be a counting error, the note is omitted. The number of groups touching this excerpt is 1,817, the number of marked rows is 3,562.

"Probably" carries this sentence. No panel writes into its interface who it buys from; we see two rows that resemble each other, and that is a hint and not proof. The groups also do not divide the stock — what is counted is what touches this excerpt. The measurement is described in detail in the panel comparison.