Buy Facebook comments: price comparison

Comments are the only product in this market where what gets delivered is text. Everything else is a counter; here, a sentence ends up under your post, written or selected by someone you don't know, visible under a profile name with a picture.

The catalogues distinguish three formats. With your own text, you supply the sentences and the panel distributes them across accounts. With random text, the panel also supplies the content, usually from a short stock of agreement and praise. The third format is emoji comments, where no sentence is created at all.

Running across this is the detail that is most often misunderstood on this page: the language. An offer that names German comments says something about the text — not about where the accounts leaving it are located. Both can coincide, but they don't have to, and in the catalogue both details sit side by side in the same name.

The difference from every other Facebook product lies in visibility. A like is a number; a comment is a statement with a sender, and both appear publicly under your post until you delete them. This page compares 923 catalogue entries from 22 panels for exactly this product.

The top results for this search are shops and guides that link to shops, and almost all of them argue the same way: a post with comments appears livelier and is favoured by the algorithm. The second part is even true — comments are the strongest interaction signal Facebook knows, because they cost more effort than a click.

But this is exactly where the drawback follows, which none of these texts mentions. Because a comment is visible, it is also checkable. Under a post from a German trades business, three sentences in stilted German then sit beside profile names that fit nothing around them. That is not the kind of evidence a prospective customer looks for, and it is the only product in this market where a single wrong detail devalues the entire post.

There are two cases in which the purchase remains explicable. One is the prompt: a post without any reply is less likely to receive a first genuine one. The other is the backdrop in an environment where nobody reads closely. Both are narrow use cases, and both assume the text is right.

We do not recommend it. We complete the calculation: 923 orderable entries from 22 panel catalogues, with base price, quantity limits, language information and date — and with the note that this product is read differently from every other product here.

Facebook weights interactions differently. A reaction is cheap to give, a comment costs time, a reply to a comment more still. Accordingly, a comment has a strong effect on whether a post is shown to further accounts — and accordingly it is an attractive product to order.

The catch lies in what happens afterwards. A conversation arises when someone replies and the other person answers back. Purchased comments arrive as a block, respond to nothing and reply to nothing; the interaction breaks off after the first step. For distribution that is a weak signal, and over time a conspicuous one.

In your own analytics it is conspicuous too. Meta Business Suite reports comments separately from reactions. A post with many comments, unchanged reach and no replies beneath it is a pattern that cannot be explained away later — not even to someone you show your metrics to.

A special case is comments under posts that ask a question. There the environment expects answers, and an ordered answer stands next to genuine ones. That is the only place where bought text does not immediately stand out, and at the same time the place where it is most likely to miss the point in content.

Involved are Cloutsy, FiveBBC, DripFeedPanel, SMMFlare, YTBot, APISeller, Auto SMM Panel, FansSuply, JungleSMM, Marketerum, SMMExclusive, Stream-Promotion, SMM-1, CrazyPanel, JingleSMM, Solid SMM, InstantPanel, PureSMM, FullSMM, MagnetBoosting, MegaVirality, SMMShiba, SMMTalk, SocNet and Viewsta. The stated status is set by Cloutsy as the oldest extract; the more recent extracts do not raise it.

The catalogue does not stand still between two extracts. Since 31/10/2026, 16 entries in this scope have a different base price than before, of which 0 upwards and 16 downwards; 0 rows have been newly added and 0 have disappeared from the catalogues. The stated point in time is the oldest of these earlier extracts, so that the row does not claim a freshness that its slowest component does not have.

Comparison is only made across the panels that have a second extract at all; their number is 22 and is not the number of indexed panels, because a newly added house has no history yet. As long as this second extract is missing, nothing appears here — a zero would mean 'nothing has moved', and that is a measurement, not a gap.

That several panels list the same product is measured. Across all catalogue pairs in the index, the largest overlap is that of MagnetBoosting: 100 % of its entries reappear at MegaVirality. The statement holds for the entire catalogues of these two panels and not for the section of this page. For comments it is particularly explanatory, because identical stocks of text are sold across several houses.

For Facebook comments the substantiated base price in the index starts at 0.11 € per 1.000 units — this value stands at APISeller —, with the middle of the field at 23.87 €. Both figures are purchase prices at wholesale level and not what a German-language sales page charges for them.

Comments are the most expensive service type in the whole Facebook inventory, and there is a factual reason for it: text has to be produced. The median base price here is orders of magnitude above that for reactions, and the spread within the category is likewise the largest.

What creates the gap is the language. Random text in any language sits at the lower end; a self-supplied text in a specific language, written by accounts with a matching profile, tops the Facebook catalogue — more expensive than any other row for this network. For German-language comments this is the relevant price level, and it is why German-language shops can charge comparatively high end prices here.

The base price per 1.000 units is a calculation figure in this category and not an order quantity. A considerable share of offers ends far below it — packages of a handful of comments are the usual format, and the cheapest base price is useless if the row does not accept the quantity.

• Zero prices appear in the raw catalogues, but they are not prices — they are almost always placeholder or test entries from the panels. In this scope that is 1 rows; they feed into no minimum, median or from-figure.
• 2 entries state quantity limits that are technical placeholders rather than orderable sizes. They still appear, but are not treated as real order limits.
• The stated euro amount is derived from the catalogue's dollar price at a rate of 0.8951 euro per dollar, as of 30/10/2026. The dollar value stays visible on the offer so that you can recalculate with your own rate.

The smallest orderable quantity in the priceable stock of this page is 1 units. That is the lowest value in the entire Facebook catalogue and fits the product: a comment is a piece, not a bulk quantity.

Upward, by contrast, the stock is tight. Many rows with self-supplied text accept only a few pieces per order, and 0 entries sell exclusively in fixed multiples. Anyone who needs a particular number of comments should therefore sort by the rows that accept that quantity, and only then by price.

Every catalogue entry carries two kinds of statement from the same interface. The name holds the sales arguments: refill window, daily output, start time, language, gender of accounts, quality level. Alongside these are sober fields stating whether refill, drip-feed and cancellation are technically provided for. The name describes the offer, the field describes the ordering route.

The two often diverge. The most common pattern is a refill window in the name with a refill field that is not set. As a rule this does not mean the replacement delivery does not exist — it means you cannot trigger it yourself and must register it with the panel's support.

With comments, however, refill is the weakest of all promises, for a reason no sales text mentions: a deleted comment is text that is gone. A replacement delivery creates new text under the same post, and nobody knows whether it fits the first. The number of offers for which the panel itself reports the refill field as set is 10 — we show where refill really is automatic, even though it achieves little here.

The drip-feed field is more useful. It states whether a delivery can be spread over a period rather than arriving in one go. For a product read as a conversation, that is the only difference a viewer would ever notice.

Quality statements such as 'real users', 'HQ' or 'organic' remain the seller's self-declarations. We translate them into comparable levels and note that they are claims. With comments, however, there is a test possibility that otherwise does not exist: the delivered text stands publicly and can be read.

How well a panel's support works we do not rate; that could only be checked with test orders. What we show is the question before that: whether you need it at all for a promised service.

For no other service type do two statements sit so closely together and mean such different things. An offer can promise German text, and it can promise German accounts. In the catalogue both statements sit in the same name, often with the same flag beside them.

We therefore record the country question at two strengths. An entry can explicitly name Germany as the target country, or it can state a region in which Germany is included — 20 entries in scope name Germany itself. The second, larger set covers the country only via a regional statement and sits behind a different filter.

In practice the language question matters more. A comment in good German under a German post goes unnoticed by nobody, wherever the account is located. A comment in broken German is noticed by everyone, even if the account is in Germany. Anyone ordering this product buys language first and origin only afterwards.

A 'Worldwide' statement does not count as a country promise. It describes the absence of a restriction, not the presence of German accounts, and it is not counted as a match for a Germany query.

Meta's terms of use prohibit artificial interaction, and the community standards on inauthentic behaviour are where this is enforced. Meta removes fake accounts continually and in waves; with a removed account, its comment disappears too. For the page itself, the most common consequence is restricted reach; deletion is the rare case.

With comments a second layer applies that does not exist for a counter. A comment that praises a product is advertising in commercial dealings. Paid recommendations that are not recognisable as such touch on competition law, and the boundary between a bought comment and a bought recommendation is narrow. Anyone ordering as a company should know this boundary; this paragraph is not legal advice.

Practically the riskiest is your own text. What you supply stands under your name on the web, becomes citable and cannot later be separated from you. Unlike a number, a comment is evidence — including against you.

Payment is made at the panel, not with us. The usual arrangement is a balance account: you top up an amount and order from it. For a company the invoice is the real hurdle — of 22 panels in the index, 2 issue one. Which payment routes exist and how refunds are handled is decided by the panel; since we do not order, we say nothing reliable about it.

A panel never needs your password. For comments the public address of the post is sufficient. Any request to enter access credentials is a reason to stop; nothing about it is safe.

Outbound links to the panels are partner links. This changes nothing about the order: sorting is by calculated price, before any link exists at all.