Buy X (Twitter) retweets: compare prices

On X, the share is called a repost. It is the passing on of someone else's post into your own timeline, and it is fundamentally different from the share function on other platforms: a visible object is created under the name of the reposting account, and the number of reposts is publicly displayed under the original post.

This makes the metric one of the few that is both a signal for readers and an event in the network. A like is just a counter; a repost is a counter plus a passing on to an audience. Whether that audience exists is the question everything depends on when buying — and it is answered further below.

A note on terminology, since otherwise it is confusing: the catalogues mostly call this product "Shares", and anyone searching for that term in German-language web results ends up almost exclusively in securities trading. "Shares" is first and foremost the English word for stocks, and the results for this query are about brokers, prices and funds, not social networks. That is why this page is named after the function and not the catalogue term: if you are looking for reposts, you are in the right place; if you are looking for securities, you are not, and we do not sell any.

Other services around X have their own pages: X likes, X replies, X followers and X impressions.

X knows two forms of passing on. The plain repost places the foreign post unchanged in your own timeline; the quote adds your own text above it and is therefore a new post with its own reach. For the original author these are two different events, and in their analytics they appear separately.

The panel catalogues mostly sell the first form. Offers that explicitly promise a quote are rare and more expensive, because a text has to be produced — the same applies as with X replies, where the prescribed text is the strongest price driver. Where an offer names both in one package, it is listed on the page of its main service. A separate price overview for the quote variant is on X quote tweets.

In practice this means: what is compared here is the increase of the repost counter under your post. That is an honest and narrower description than "more distribution", and it is the reason the next heading turns out the way it does.

For the catalogue term "Shares", not a single competitor from the social sector appears in the German-language search results — the pages at the top belong to a different industry. So there is no counter-position in them that we would have to argue against, and no price figure to orient on either. What this page delivers are 365 orderable entries from 22 panels, with base price, quantity limits and date.

Viewed soberly, the purchased repost is a number with an empty promise behind it. It raises the public counter, and to a reader it looks like evidence that the post was worth passing on. The passing on itself, however, goes to the audience of the reposting account — and accounts that sell reposts in bulk have no audience.

The case where it still works is the post that gets circulated as proof: an announcement, an offer, a post under which a three-digit repost count makes more impression than a single-digit one. Anyone who needs that buys exactly that — and should know that they have not bought the distribution along with it.

The drawback is the same as in all categories with a public number: the ratio stands out. A post with many reposts and few replies reads to a practised eye as ordered, and on X that eye is more common than elsewhere.

A genuine repost is the most effective event on X, because it does two things at once: it counts as a strong reaction in the platform's calculations, and it introduces the post to a new audience. The second part is generally what produces the growth authors hope for from this metric.

Exactly this second part is missing from an order. The reposting account has no readers, so the passing on reaches no one; what arrives is the counter. For distribution the first part remains — a reaction that X, however, weights afterwards according to which account it comes from and what follows. A repost from an account without history is a weak example of a strong signal type.

The gap becomes visible in your own analytics. X shows how many impressions a post has received and where they come from. A repost wave without a corresponding rise in impressions is exactly the pattern where numbers sit side by side and do not fit together — anyone reading their own numbers sees the order there first.

Visibility outside the platform follows the same logic in another form. What moves a post up in web search are links from pages that actually embed it. A repost entry is not such a link.

Involved are Cloutsy, FiveBBC, DripFeedPanel, SMMFlare, YTBot, APISeller, Auto SMM Panel, FansSuply, JungleSMM, Marketerum, SMMExclusive, Stream-Promotion, SMM-1, CrazyPanel, JingleSMM, Solid SMM, InstantPanel, PureSMM, FullSMM, MagnetBoosting, MegaVirality, SMMShiba, SMMTalk, SocNet and Viewsta. The stated status is set by Cloutsy as the oldest extract — the fresher panels do not raise it, because a figure cannot be more current than its oldest component.

The catalogue does not stand still between two extracts. Since 31/10/2026, 4 entries in this scope have a different base price than before, of which 0 upward and 4 downward; 0 rows have been added and 0 have disappeared from the catalogues. The stated point in time is the oldest of these earlier extracts, so that the row does not claim a freshness its slowest component does not have.

The comparison covers only the panels that have a second extract at all; their number is 22 and is not the number of indexed panels, because a newly added house has no history yet. As long as this second extract is missing, nothing is shown here — a zero would mean "nothing has moved", and that is a measurement, not a gap.

For X reposts, the reliable base price in the index starts at 0.04 € per 1.000 units, with the middle of the range at 5.91 €. The lowest value is held by SocNet. Both figures come from the panel catalogues and are purchase prices at wholesale level. What a German-language sales page charges for the same quantity is higher and is not part of this comparison.

Reposts are priced close to likes and clearly below replies. The reason is the product: an account has to press a button, it has to write nothing and nothing has to persist. What makes this category more expensive than a pure delivery is that the passing on remains in the profile of the executing account and gets noticed there.

The spread between the lowest and the middle base price follows two attributes: origin promise and durability. Rows with a country tag cost many times the worldwide product, and rows with "Non Drop" in the name likewise. The catalogue cannot prove either — payment can.

A low base price becomes a low final price only if your quantity fits the entry. The number of offers in the index that sell exclusively in fixed multiples is 0; for them a price stated per 1.000 is a calculation value and not an orderable position.

Only the wholesale level is compared here. The catalogue price is the only price of this product that we can verify ourselves: it stands in the panel's interface, with quantity, limits and timestamp. What an intermediary makes of it is stated on their own site and in no field we read.

• Zero prices appear in the raw catalogues but are not prices — they are almost always placeholder or test entries from the panels. In this scope these are 0 rows; they feed into no minimum, median or from-figure and still remain in the catalogue.
• 5 entries state quantity limits that are technical placeholders rather than orderable sizes. They still appear in the list but do not count as a real order limit.
• The stated euro amount is derived from the catalogue's dollar price at a rate of 0.8951 euro per dollar, status 30/10/2026. The dollar value remains visible on the offer so you can recalculate with your own rate.

The smallest quantity that can be ordered across the priced rows is 1 units. For a single post this is the real decision: a repost count that does not fit the account's follower count stands out more than a low one.

Every catalogue entry carries two kinds of statement from the same interface. The name holds the sales arguments: refill window, daily output, start time, country of origin, quality level. Alongside them are sober fields that state whether refill, dripfeed and cancellation are technically provided. The name describes the offer, the field describes the ordering path.

With reposts, refill has a real use case, unlike pure counting quantities. If the reposting account is removed, its repost disappears — and the public counter under your post drops visibly. The number of offers in the scope where the panel itself reports the refill field as set is 36; there replenishment runs without a ticket, and this is exactly what you can filter for. We show where refill is genuinely automatic.

The other direction is common: a refill window stands in the name, but the field is not set. That usually does not mean replacement does not exist — it means you cannot trigger it yourself and must request it through the panel's support. Filtering and sorting therefore follow the field, with the claim from the title shown alongside.

Quality claims such as "real users", "HQ" or "Non Drop" remain the seller's self-declarations. With reposts they are partly verifiable by exception: unlike with likes, the reposting account stays visible, and anyone who has received a delivery can look at what kind of profiles are there. Any other reader can do the same.

How well a panel's support works we do not assess; that could only be checked with test orders. What we show is the question before it: whether you need it at all for a promised service.

Repost offers also carry country notes, and behind them stand two different statements. An entry can name Germany explicitly as the target country, or it can state a region in which Germany is included. We keep these separate — 1 entries in the index name Germany themselves.

The second, larger set covers the country only via a regional statement. For a German-speaking account this is a difference, which is why it sits behind a separate filter with us rather than in the same figure.

For this service type the country question is more visible than for any other except replies, because the reposting accounts remain clickable. A German-language post under which only foreign-language profiles appear explains itself to every reader — here a country promise pays into something that is actually visible.

A "Worldwide" statement does not count as a country promise. It describes the absence of a restriction, not the presence of German accounts.

X's terms of service expressly prohibit artificial interaction and coordinated redistribution. Enforcement happens in the product: accounts recognised as automated disappear, and with them their reposts. The public counter then quietly drops again. For your own account the risk is moderate — higher than with clicks, lower than with replies, because no content is created in your name. Ordering is not a crime in Germany, but it is a breach of contract.

In a business context a second layer is added. Anyone who presents a purchased repost count to customers or advertising partners as evidence of reach presents a figure they ordered themselves — and that is a matter for competition law, not just platform rules. This paragraph is not legal advice.

Payment is made to the panel, not to us. Usual is a credit account: you load an amount and order from it. For business purchasing the invoice question is decisive and rarely answered — the number of panels in the index that issue an invoice at all is 2.

No panel needs your password. For reposts the public address of the post is enough. Any request to enter access data or authorise an application is, regardless of price, a reason to stop.

Outgoing links to the panels are partner links. That changes nothing about the order: sorting is by calculated price, before any link exists at all.

What makes a repost valuable is the audience of the account that passes it on. That audience cannot be ordered, but it can be built: a post that takes a position or sensibly summarises something is passed on; one that repeats news without context is not.

The second, underestimated route is engagement. On X a post is often passed on by exactly one account that saw it first — and that account is usually read because you reply under its posts yourself. The mechanism is the same as everywhere in this network: visibility arises from replies.

The compliant route through money is the platform's advertisements. They deliver not reposts but readers — and readers are the precondition for anyone passing anything on at all. Anyone with a budget should, in fairness, weigh the prices on this page against that alternative.