The British newspapers The Times and The Sunday Times want to sell selected content in future without a permanent digital subscription. According to subscriptions director Abs Ahmed, a first test of so-called "Macro Payments" is due to begin in the coming months. Prices, duration and the final product are still open as of 29 October 2026. For German media, the key question is whether occasional visitors arriving from social media can be monetised with a clearly limited, useful offer, without weakening existing subscriptions.
The economic starting point: subscriptions grow, occasional readers rarely pay
Nothing fundamental is expected to change at The Times' paywall for now. According to News Corp's annual report of 5 August 2026, The Times, Sunday Times and Times Literary Supplement together had 681.000 digital subscriptions as of 30 June 2026, compared with 640.000 a year earlier. The figure covers several titles, so it is not a value for The Times alone.
The new experiment targets a different group: people who want, for example, a particular guide but do not want to take out a permanent news subscription. Ahmed told Digiday that, following an internal study, more than three quarters of the occasional users surveyed would find more flexible access appealing. The sample and actual willingness to pay were not disclosed. Interest in a survey is not yet revenue.
A topic bundle is something different from buying an article
The Times leadership names annual special formats such as rankings and regional quality-of-life guides as possible offers. Time-limited access for one day or one week is also under discussion. A confirmed combination, a sale price or a concrete launch country does not yet exist.
The difference from classic micropayments is decisive: instead of billing every single news click, the aim is to sell a self-contained benefit. That could suit visitors who discover a single question through search, a newsletter or a short social video. Whether the idea holds up must first be shown by a controlled test.
Germany: only eleven percent pay for online news at all
The size of the addressable market remains limited. The Digital News Report 2026 for Germany shows 11 percent of respondents who paid for online news in the past year, including payments to individual providers and aggregators. In the cross-country Reuters Institute analysis, the share in 20 established paid-news markets is 17 percent. The underlying populations are not directly comparable.
At the same time, in the 48multi-market analysis 54 percent get news via social and video platforms, while 51 percent use offers from news organisations directly. For publishers, the goal is therefore less about turning every social click into a subscription and more about identifying suitable formats for different usage intentions. Which metrics beyond pageviews matter is explained in our analysis of publisher traffic 2026.
Three tests for a German experiment
Additional revenue rather than cannibalisation: publishers must weigh paid bundle purchases against possible cancellations or missing full subscriptions. Revenue per visitor alone is not enough for that. Repeat rather than one-off purchase: a second purchase or a later membership is more meaningful than a single transaction. Source and reason for visit: a social video leading to a specific guide should be assessed differently from a loyal reader visiting the homepage.
How paid special features can complement existing memberships is shown by The Hill's model with election data. And Motherly's shift to social video, WhatsApp and events illustrates why publishers should measure retention separately across channels. For individual journalists, a similar revenue question arises, as our article on news creators and their subscription models shows.
Bottom line: The Times has not yet launched a new paid product. What is interesting is the planned shift from selling individual article access to selling a clearly limited information benefit. Whether this becomes a viable business model depends not on the label "Macro Payments", but on the proven additional contribution margin while the subscription base stays stable.
